Major Development on Designated Undeveloped Coast
The huge multi-storey hotel and four apartment blocks, and other large
buildings are to be built in an area which is designated as Undeveloped
Coast i.e. not for development.
The scale of these buildings will cause severe visual pollution.
Part of the site is a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) which
means it is of national importance and is protected under law.
The dunes system is constantly moving and very few of these remain in
Scotland—the development will stabilise or fix the dunes in place.
The development will destroy the 4000 year old natural habitat of the
dunes.
National policies protecting biodiversity will be contravened.
Housing
The residential housing (500 units) and 400 person staff accommodation
block should not be considered in this application but should be part of the
Development Plan process which applies to all other developers.
It is against planning policy for the sale of housing to be used to
finance a business.
The pressure put on existing infrastructure such as roads, sewers,
schooling and local health facilities, will be immense
Road traffic levels will be significantly increased, adding to further
congestion on roads leading into Aberdeen and adding to carbon emissions and
noise pollution.
The development is expected to increase air traffic, which will lead to
more greenhouse gas emissions and more noise disturbance at a time when
Aberdeenshire Council are committed to reducing emissions.
Coastal ‘squeeze’. A large residential development near the coast will
have major implications for flood defences and coastal protection.
Access
Several walking routes, including one from the popular Balmedie car park,
will be lost. Both the extensive housing and the golf course will severely
limit the public’s right to enjoy the dunes via responsible outdoor access
Economics Argument Flawed
The development can only be justified on economic grounds of
‘national importance). In fact the benefits in terms of
jobs have been exaggerated and the economic claims of the developer have not
been independently reviewed
Yours sincerely